Deputy President William Ruto’s UDA party has written to DPP Noordin Haji seeking prosecution of state officers engaging in active politics.
Through a letter signed by secretary general Veronica Maina, the party wants the DPP to invoke article 157(6)(a) of the Constitution and press charges against the officers to safeguard a free and fair electoral process.
The party listed Interior CS Fred Matiang’i, his ICT counterpart Joe Mucheru, James Macharia of Transport and Infrastructure, Devolutions’ Eugene Wamalwa and Peter Munya of Agriculture.
Interior PS Karanja Kibicho and Environment CS Keriako Tobiko are also listed.
“The Cabinet Secretaries and the Principal Secretary being state officers are in breach of Section 15 of the Election Offences Act, 2016 for using their offices to engage in active support of the Azimio Coalition Presidential candidate and for publicly indicating their support for their preferred candidate,” Maina said.
She said the state officers have been accompanying the Azimio flagbearer to his campaigns, pledged support for his presidential bid and vowed to leverage on the administrative structures to ensure he wins the August 9 polls.
In particular, the UDA SG accused Matiang’i of directing administrative officers under him to the village level to respect President Uhuru Kenyatta’s preferred presidential candidate.
Uhuru endorsed the Azimio la Umoja Coalition presidential candidate Raila Odinga as his preferred successor.
Other than breaching the Election Offences Act, Maina told the DPP that the state officers have also violated the Constitution, the Leadership and Integrity Act and the Public Officer and Ethics Act.
“The involvement of the Cabinet Secretaries and the Principal Secretary also raises doubt on the neutrality and it is barefaced, unconcealed and blatant conflict of interest,” she said.
Further, she pointed out that the Interior and ICT ministries have key roles to play in the administration of the forthcoming General Election and cannot be seen to be partisan.
She dismissed as flimsy the argument that public officers are at liberty to support a candidate of their choice in an election on the strength of Article 38 of the Constitution.